Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper explores how the historical legal and social 'otherization' of Santhal, a tribal Minak in India and Bangladesh, has produced two antagonistic counter-tactics, which manifest in people's dispute resolution. The paper begins to explore the historical background of Santhal boycott and coordination’s in both countries.The paper then evaluates conflicting theories of how conflict processes serve as mirrors that reflect this exclusion, improving the nuances of sitting as a symbol of deflection. My filming data suggests that the strategy of controversy is closely associated with perceived localization of harassment and harassment.Seeing internal strategies that promote harmony and re-enforce minority hegemony serve as strategies of resistance where an oppressor takes the form of a distant and untouchable state or power elite. But where the politics of conflict is local and the immediate dispute is externalized and the conflict converts into a concrete strategy.